ArticleBMC oral health2026
Single-model deep learning approach for simultaneous cervical vertebral maturation staging and skeletal jaw relationship on lateral cephalograms using YOLOv8 and CNN.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of a Machine Learning Model for Cervical Vertebra-Based Skeletal Maturity Assessment in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients Using Cephalometric Radiographs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to develop an integrated artificial intelligence (AI) pipeline for cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) staging and skeletal jaw relationships and to validate its output against the results of human observers.
methodsA total of 720 lateral cephalograms were collected from the archives of the orthodontic department. The participants' ages ranged from 8 to 18 years. Cephalograms were categorized into six cervical stages based on McNamara's criteria and classified into skeletal Class I, II, and III patterns based on their ANB angles. The dataset was divided into a training set (n = 540) and a test set (n = 180). The training set was used to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) and a YOLOv8 model. The test set of cephalograms was coded and randomly assigned to two orthodontists for comparison with the AI model results using weighted kappa and Cohen's kappa statistical analyses to verify accuracy.
resultsFor human observers, the interobserver agreement ranges were as follows: (κw ≈ 0.976-0.989) for skeletal classification and (κw ≈ 0.956-0.999) for CVM staging, while the intra-observer reliability was also almost perfect for both methods (κw ≈ 0.82- 0.85). Substantial agreement was found between the generated AI model and human observers for skeletal classification (κ = 0.725) and CVM staging (κ = 0.786). Both results were statistically significant (p < 0.01).
conclusionsWithin the limitations of this study, the AI model exhibited substantial agreement with human observers for CVM staging and skeletal assessment, demonstrating its potential viability as a clinical decision-support tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.