Trial reportStudies in family planning2026
User and Provider Experiences with a Digital Health Family Planning Counseling Tool for Women Living with HIV in Kenya.
Trial report in Studies in family planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "Now I feel like I can": exploring e-commerce for self-care contraception in Kenya.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Women living with HIV(WLHIV) have diverse and complex reproductive health needs that require patient-centered, informed decision-making. Digital tools to support reproductive life planning may improve reproductive health counseling and outcomes for these women. We evaluated user experiences with a self-administered, tablet-based family planning (FP) counseling tool as part of a digital health intervention implemented within a cluster randomized trial in Kenya. We conducted 10 focus group discussions with WLHIV (n = 95) who received the counseling tool and in-depth interviews (n = 10) with providers. Data were collected using semistructured guides, transcribed, translated, and thematically analyzed. Women's median age was 26 years, and 52 percent were married. Providers had a median of seven years' experience. WLHIV and providers found the counseling tool acceptable and felt it improved decision-making, FP knowledge, and patient-provider interactions. Women reported that the counseling tool supported informed FP decisions, improved awareness about less familiar options, and dispelled myths and misconceptions. Providers said the counseling tool helped tailor counseling, though it was challenging to use with women with more FP experience or with a selected method, but helpful among new FP users and adolescents. Participants also felt that the tool was lengthy. Tailoring the counseling tool and making it optional for specific groups of WLHIV may improve feasibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.