Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42338424›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2026

Age at menarche and adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: triangulating evidence from multivariable and Mendelian randomization analyses.

Elisabeth Aiton, Maria Carolina Borges, Ana Gonçalves Soares, Gemma L Clayton, Tom A Bond, Qian Yang, Maria C Magnus, Deborah A Lawlor, Abigail Fraser, Amy E Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elisabeth AitonPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, BS1 5DS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0001-3480
Maria Carolina BorgesPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, BS1 5DS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7785-4547
Ana Gonçalves SoaresPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, BS1 5DS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2763-4647
Gemma L ClaytonPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, BS1 5DS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9525-2758
Tom A BondPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, BS1 5DS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9298-6860
Qian YangDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8778-4132
Maria C MagnusCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo 0456, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0568-3774
Deborah A LawlorPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, BS1 5DS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6793-2262
Abigail FraserPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, BS1 5DS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7741-9470
Amy E TaylorPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, BS1 5DS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1853-0563

Funding

United Kingdom Research and Innovation Medical Research Council MC_UU_00032/05Wellcome Trust PhD studentship 228276/Z/23/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObservational studies have suggested that a younger age at menarche is associated with increased risks of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. However, it is unclear whether these relationships are causal.

methodsWe estimated the associations between age at menarche and 13 pre-specified pregnancy outcomes by using two approaches. We estimated observational associations in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (N = 9441) using multivariable regression accounting for educational attainment, ethnicity, maternal age, parity, offspring sex, and adiposity. We conducted two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) using data from the Mendelian Randomization in Pregnancy (MR-PREG) collaboration (77 683-707 797 pregnancies) and multivariable MR (MVMR) accounting for genetically-proxied adiposity.

resultsOlder age at menarche was associated with lower risks of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational hypertension, and preeclampsia, but accounting for adiposity attenuated these effects across approaches. For example, per 1-year older age at menarche, the odds ratio (OR) for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI) : 0.84, 0.93) in inverse variance weighted MR and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.01) in MVMR, while the observational association attenuated from OR = 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.94) to OR = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.01). No clear evidence was found for the effects of age at menarche on small-for-gestational-age, low birthweight, post-term birth, or perinatal depression from either approach. For other outcomes evidence was limited by imprecision (very preterm birth, gestational diabetes) or inconsistent effects in sensitivity analyses (offspring birthweight, large-for-gestational-age, high birthweight, preterm birth).

conclusionWe find little robust evidence for causal effects of age at menarche on pregnancy outcomes. Effects of younger menarche on increased risks of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy may be driven by adiposity.

Indexed as

Hypertension, Pregnancy-InducedMenarchePregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeAdiposityAdultAge FactorsBirth WeightFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesMendelian Randomization AnalysisMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioPre-EclampsiaadiposityALSPACbody mass indexmenarcheMendelian randomizationmultivariable Mendelian randomizationpregnancytriangulation

Identifiers

PMID42338424
PMCPMC13291527

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.