Evidence mapPaperPMID 42338579Full record

ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026

The Impact of the Multidisciplinary Team on Medication Adherence in Type 2 Diabetes: A Narrative Review.

Ghanshyam Kacha, Patrick J Highton, Mark P Funnell, Samuel Seidu, Kamlesh Khunti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ghanshyam KachaDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Patrick J HightonDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Mark P FunnellDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7473-5999
Samuel SeiduDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Kamlesh KhuntiDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2343-7099

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a highly prevalent chronic disease associated with multiple long-term conditions (Multimorbidity) requiring frequent reviews and escalating pharmacotherapy. However, attainment of glycemic targets in routine clinical practice remains suboptimal, with medication non-adherence representing a major contributor to the efficacy-effectiveness gap. This narrative review summarizes the impact of multidisciplinary team (MDT) care on medication adherence in people with T2DM. We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL (9 December 2025), supplemented by Google Scholar and reference-list screening, to identify evidence on MDT models and medication adherence outcomes in adults with T2DM. We mainly included original research (n = 19) with the addition of relevant reviews (n = 2) and systematic reviews (n = 4). Overall, multifaceted interventions and collaborated care involving the MDT were associated with improved medication adherence, particularly where teams were integrated and preserved continuity rather than operating as parallel services. Medication focused MDT interventions, most commonly pharmacist led medication review and follow-up, were generally associated with improvements in adherence and, in some studies, improvements in outcomes such as quality of life and healthcare utilization. However, reliance on self-report measures and variable intervention intensity limited comparability. Behavioral adherence support, delivered by nurses or other MDT members using motivational and action planning techniques, showed modest improvements when objectively measured. Additionally, psychosocially integrated approaches addressing depression, diabetes distress and social vulnerability showed potential to improve adherence and clinical outcomes, though adherence was not consistently measured directly. Overall, MDT care appears most likely to improve adherence when interventions are structured, roles within the team are clearly defined, collaboration between professions is well integrated, behavioral and psychosocial barriers are addressed, and follow-up is of sufficient intensity and duration. Future research should standardize adherence outcomes, incorporate objective measures where feasible, control for additional consultation time, and evaluate durability and scalability of multifaceted MDT approaches beyond short-term follow-up.

Indexed as

interdisciplinary caremedication adherencemultidisciplinary teampatient-centered caretype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID42338579
PMCPMC13285930

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.