Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42338634›Full record

ReviewArrhythmia & electrophysiology review2026

Who Benefits Most? Patient Selection for Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation in Heart Failure.

Aaron A Sifuentes, Mohammed Mhanna, Paari Dominic, Peter Farjo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aaron A SifuentesDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City, IA, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7902-4319
Mohammed MhannaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City, IA, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1443-7177
Paari DominicDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City, IA, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7843-375X
Peter FarjoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City, IA, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0125-610X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AF and heart failure (HF) often coexist, amplifying morbidity and mortality. Catheter ablation is an effective rhythm control strategy, particularly in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, where studies such as CASTLE-AF show improved survival, fewer HF hospitalisations and better quality of life. Evidence in HF with preserved ejection fraction is emerging; RAFT-AF included HF with preserved ejection fraction patients, but showed no significant primary outcome difference, though subgroup data offer insights across the HF spectrum. Procedural risks, influenced by patient frailty and device presence (e.g. left ventricular assist devices and CRT), necessitate careful selection and periprocedural optimisation. Advances in ablation technology, including pulsed field ablation, and adjunctive strategies show promise but require further validation. Early rhythm control, as supported by EAST-AFNET 4, may prevent adverse remodelling and improve outcomes if applied before extensive atrial disease develops. Future directions emphasise multidisciplinary, personalised approaches integrating imaging and biomarkers to optimise patient selection. Thoughtful application of catheter ablation can enhance outcomes in carefully selected HF patients with AF.

Indexed as

ablationAFheart failure

Identifiers

PMID42338634
PMCPMC13284791

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.