ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2026
Development and Validation of an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Identification of Dysphagia in Patients with COPD.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Dysphagia is a common yet often overlooked complication in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients, who are prone due to abnormal breathing patterns, impaired airway protection, and generalized frailty. This not only predisposes them to aspiration pneumonia but also serves as a key trigger for acute exacerbations of COPD, substantially increasing the risk of adverse outcomes. Early identification of dysphagia is essential for improving prognosis in COPD. However, research on early detection is limited, particularly regarding machine learning prediction. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning based risk assessment model for dysphagia in COPD and deploy it as a user-friendly web-based clinical tool to assist clinicians in risk identification and early intervention. Patients and Methods: Retrospective medical records from 710 COPD patients admitted between February 2025 and January 2026 were analyzed. Swallowing function was assessed using the Water-Swallowing Test. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified independent risk factors, which were used to develop and compare eight machine learning models. Model performance was evaluated using ROC, calibration, and decision curves with Bootstrap internal validation. Key variables were interpreted via Shapley Additive Explanations, and the final model was deployed online. Results: Dysphagia prevalence was 29.3%. Multivariate regression identified five key risk factors: disease duration, BMI, history of tracheal intubation, muscle strength, and the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) score for dyspnea severity. Among eight machine learning models, the XGBoost model showed the best performance in the training set (AUC 0.921, 95% CI 0.901-0.940) and demonstrated good calibration and highest clinical net benefit. The model was deployed online (https://dysphagiamodel.shinyapps.io/COPD-DP/). Conclusion: We developed and validated an online machine learning-based dysphagia risk assessment tool for COPD, demonstrating discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility for risk stratification and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.