ReviewCardiology research and practice2026
Bibliometric Analysis of Research Hotspots and Emerging Trends in Mitochondrial DNA and Atherosclerosis (2004-2025).
Review in Cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bibliometric Analysis of Research Hotspots and Emerging Trends in Mitochondrial DNA and Atherosclerosis (2004-2025).Cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the research course, hotspots, and development trends of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and atherosclerosis (AS) based on knowledge graph technology, providing references for clinical and basic research in this field. Methods: Publications themed on mtDNA and AS published between 2004 and 2025 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) database. CiteSpace 6.4. R1 Advanced software was used to construct and visually analyze knowledge graphs of authors, institutions, keywords, etc. Results: A total of 341 publications were included, with the annual publication volume showing an overall upward trend. Research methods for mtDNA and AS are diversifying, with mechanistic investigations showing a trending focus toward specific molecular pathways. A total of 241 authors and 353 publishing institutions were analyzed. Ten keyword clusters were identified, including Cluster #0 oxidative stress, Cluster #1 mitochondrial DNA, Cluster #2 degradation, Cluster #3 atherosclerosis, Cluster #4 hydrogen peroxide, Cluster #5 roles, Cluster #6 MAPK pathway, Cluster #7 epigallocatechin gallate, Cluster #8 mitochondrial DNA copy number, and Cluster #9 vascular disease. Conclusion: Research has evolved from foundational mechanistic studies to a focus on translational and clinical applications. Moving forward, efforts should be intensified to enhance collaboration among research teams and deepen mechanistic investigations, thereby laying a solid foundation for clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.