ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026
The combination of
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Previous studies and society guidelines have proposed probiotics as a complementary therapy for acute infectious diarrhea, which may shorten the disease course, yet strain-specific effects and microbiome correlates remain incompletely defined. We aim to evaluate the effect of a combination of Patient and methods: In a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label trial at a tertiary pediatric emergency department (March-August 2024), children aged 1-6 years with acute infectious diarrhea lasting less than 24 h were allocated 1:1 to standard therapy (oral rehydration ± intravenous fluids) with or without 5-day probiotic ( Results: Of 145 enrolled children, 79 in the probiotic group (34 girls, 45 boys) and 66 in the control (30 girls and 36 boys); baseline demographics were comparable. The duration of diarrhea was significantly reduced in the probiotic group compared to the control group (46.4 ± 29.6 h vs. 81.6 ± 38.5 h, Conclusion: This study evaluates a specific combination of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.