ArticleAnnals of intensive care2026
Impact of gender on how intensive care medicine residents experience their medical studies and training and perceive their specialty: a national survey.
Article in Annals of intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Parity has been reached among French residents in the intensive care medicine (ICM) specialty; however, concerns about underrepresentation of women in leadership position and gender discriminations remain. We hypothesised that perception of gender inequity differs between female and male ICM residents and increases along the ICM training. Methods: This nationwide observational closed-survey investigated how ICM residents experienced their medical curriculum, how they perceived the ICM specialty, and the potential reasons for women to be underrepresented in leadership position. Results: Among 113 residents who responded to the survey, 63 (55.6%) were females, and 85 (75.2%) were beginners. Twenty-nine (25.7%) answered to be always or often self-confident, and this number was lower in female than in male residents (14.3% versus 40.8%, p = 0.003). Women had less often than men the feeling to keep up with the situation along their medical training (39.7% versus 70.8%, p = 0.004). Societal injunctions to prioritise family over professional responsibilities were more often considered as barriers to leadership position by women than by men (75.8% versus 51.1%, p = 0.015). Fully trained residents agreed more frequently than beginners with the 2 following reasons associated with gender gap in ICM leadership position: men being more ambitious (31.1% versus 9.4%, p = 0.024) and professional environment discriminating against women (64% versus 46.2%, p = 0.017). Experience of non-physical sexual harassment was very common in female residents, with 74.6% of them reporting to have been directly subjected to jokes of a sexual nature (versus 28.6% of men, p = 0.001) and 49.2% of them to have been victims of allegations with humiliating connotation (versus 22.4% of men, p = 0.007). Conclusions: Female ICM residents reported more often the feeling of not coping with their medical training, the lack of self-confidence, and non-physical sexual harassment than men. Reported awareness of a less supportive institutional environment to women academic career and of difference in assertiveness between men and women increased along advancement in ICM training suggesting room for interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.