Evidence mapPaperPMID 42339335Full record

ReviewOphthalmology science2026

Assessing Pupil Light Reflex Metrics in Glaucoma: Insights from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mohammadreza Moniritilaki, Peter Wagner, Sieu K Khuu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammadreza MoniritilakiSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Peter WagnerSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Sieu K KhuuSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Topic: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify the most affected pupil light reflex (PLR) metrics and determine the optimal stimulus conditions for detecting glaucomatous deficits. Clinical Relevance: The PLR is altered in glaucoma and understanding the basis of this change may provide a useful method for disease detection and progression monitoring. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases from June 2023 to April 2025. Studies evaluating PLR in glaucoma patients and healthy controls were included. Data extraction focused on PLR metrics such as amplitude of constriction, velocity of constriction and dilation, latency of constriction and dilation, and postillumination pupil response (PIPR). A meta-analysis was performed (Hedges' g) to determine the impact of glaucoma on each PLR metric. Subgroup and moderator analyses were conducted to assess the influence of dark adaptation, stimulus duration, and stimulus color on PLR metrics and to examine the relationship between PLR metrics and age, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, and mean deviation (MD). This systematic review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251079002). Results: A meta-analysis revealed that the amplitude of constriction (the most affected metric), latency of constriction, velocity of constriction, and PIPR were significantly affected in mild glaucoma. Subgroup analysis suggested that the testing conditions involving a stimulus lasting >1 second, after dark adaptation of <5 minutes, are most sensitive for detecting PLR deficits. Moderator analysis indicated that age, RNFL thickness, and MD were associated with variations in PLR metrics. In severe glaucoma, the amplitude of constriction, duration of dilation, velocity of constriction, and PIPR showed the largest effect sizes (ESs). Overall, severe glaucoma led to larger ESs, indicating greater change in PLR metrics was associated with disease severity. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the amplitude of constriction is the most affected PLR metric in both mild and severe glaucoma. Furthermore, our results indicate that a stimulus lasting >1 second, when presented after a dark adaptation of <5 minutes, may represent the most sensitive condition for detecting amplitude of constriction deficits in mild glaucoma. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Diagnostic biomarkersGlaucomaMeta-analysisPupillary light reflexSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42339335
PMCPMC13284455

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.