Evidence mapPaperPMID 42339402Full record

ReviewIntegrative medicine research2026

Integration of large language models and evidence-based Chinese medicine: A scoping review.

Yuanyuan Yao, Hui Liu, Daoze Yang, Xufei Luo, Honghao Lai, Zhe Wang, Yaolong Chen, Zhaoxiang Bian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative medicine research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuanyuan YaoResearch Unit of Evidence-Based Evaluation and Guidelines, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2021RU017), School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Hui LiuResearch Unit of Evidence-Based Evaluation and Guidelines, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2021RU017), School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Daoze YangThe Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Xufei LuoResearch Unit of Evidence-Based Evaluation and Guidelines, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2021RU017), School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Honghao LaiSchool of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Zhe WangDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Yaolong ChenResearch Unit of Evidence-Based Evaluation and Guidelines, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2021RU017), School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Zhaoxiang BianVincent V.C. Woo Chinese Medicine Clinical Research Institute, School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Large language models (LLMs) have attracted increasing attention in medical research and clinical practice and have been applied to processes related to evidence-based medicine (EBM). However, the extent of their integration with evidence-based Chinese medicine (CM) remains unclear. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data from 30 November 2022 to 31 January 2026, with supplementary searches conducted in Google Scholar. Studies were included if they applied LLMs to EBM processes within a CM context or investigated LLMs in CM using established evidence-based research designs. Descriptive analysis summarized study characteristics, and findings were mapped according to the evidence ecosystem framework. Results: A total of 12 studies published between 2023 and 2025 were included. Most studies integrated LLMs into different stages of the EBM workflow within a CM context. At the evidence generation stage, studies explored the role of LLMs in identifying research priorities. At the evidence synthesis stage, LLM performance was evaluated in literature screening, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. At the evidence translation stage, studies evaluated the performance of LLMs in guideline-related question answering and recommendation generation. At the evidence implementation stage, LLMs combined with knowledge graphs or retrieval-augmented generation were used to develop intelligent question-answering systems based on CM guidelines or standards. Conclusion: Existing studies suggest that LLMs have begun to be explored across multiple stages of evidence-based CM research and show potential for improving evidence synthesis efficiency and supporting knowledge translation and application. Protocol registration: Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/ztbd5/overview).

Indexed as

Chinese medicineEvidence-based medicineLarge language modelScoping review

Identifiers

PMID42339402
PMCPMC13285422

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.