ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
Beyond gender and racial bias: Towards pro-justice ethical GenAI use in medicine and health.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence(GenAI) is increasingly being used in the health sector. Much of the current discourse on GenAI is focused on technical accuracy and bias in its outputs. This editorial argues the need to go beyond bias mitigation and take a pro-justice approach for ethical GenAI use in health and medicine: one that actively confronts injustices, addresses structural inequities, and considers our intrinsic intergenerational responsibilities towards nature, humans everywhere , and other species. The piece draws from feminist ethics, justice theories, and decolonial practices to outline four key principles for a pro-justice approach for ethical GenAI use in medicine and health: intersectionality, epistemic justice, environmental justice, and social justice. It highlights the importance of such an approach, particularly for women's health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.