ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2026
Epidemiological profile of pregnant women undergoing first-trimester preeclampsia screening at a tertiary reference center in Brazil.
Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiological profile of first-trimester pregnant women attending a tertiary reference center in São Paulo, Brazil, and to assess its association with the development of preeclampsia.
methodsThis study involved retrospective and prospective cohorts of pregnant women undergoing first-trimester ultrasound for aneuploidy screening between 11 and 13+6 weeks' gestation from 2020 to 2023. Maternal, obstetric, and clinical characteristics, including mean arterial pressure, were collected via questionnaire and clinical measurements. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics and stepwise forward logistic regression to identify factors associated with preeclampsia development.
resultsA total of 104 pregnant women were included, with a mean age of 30.9 years. Most were White (48.3%), non-smokers (86.5%), overweight (mean body mass index: 28.5 kg/m2), and had spontaneous pregnancies (100%). Nulliparous and primiparous women accounted for 71.9% of the sample. Low risk for preeclampsia was observed in 84.3% and high risk in 15.7%. History of previous preeclampsia (OR 46.0, 95%CI 3.2-654.2), chronic arterial hypertension (OR 11.2, 95%CI 1.9-64.6), and increased first-trimester mean arterial pressure (OR 1.2, 95%CI 1.1-1.4) were independently associated with higher preeclampsia risk. Other variables, including race, parity, body mass index, and uterine artery Doppler indices, were not significant predictors.
conclusionPrior history of preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, and elevated first-trimester mean arterial pressure were key predictors of preeclampsia development. These findings support the importance of first-trimester risk stratification using maternal history and mean arterial pressure measurement to guide early preventive interventions, particularly in settings where biochemical markers are not routinely available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.