ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026
High Rate of Mutation and Efficient Removal by Selection of Structural Variants From Natural Populations of Caenorhabditis Elegans.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The importance of genomic structural variants (SVs) is well-appreciated, but less is known about their mutational properties than of single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and short indels. The reason is simple: the longer the variant, the less likely it will be covered by a single sequencing read, thus the harder it is to map unambiguously to a unique genomic location. Here we report SV mutation rate estimates from 6 mutation accumulation (MA) lines from 2 strains of C. elegans using long-read (PacBio) sequencing. The inferred SV mutation rate is ∼0.03/genome/generation, about 1/10 the SNV rate and 1/4 the short indel rate. We identified 40 SV mutations (12 insertions, 28 deletions, 0 inversions) and 52 false positive (FP) variants by manual inspection. Excluding one atypical line (5 mutations, 35 FPs), the signal (mutant) to noise (FP) ratio is approximately 2:1. False negative rates were determined by simulating variants in the reference genome and observing "recall." Recall rate ranges from >90% for short indels and declines as SV length increases. Small deletions have nearly the same recall rate as small insertions (∼100 bp), but deletions have higher recall rates than insertions as the size increases. The reported SV mutation rate is likely a lower bound. A quarter of identified SV mutations occur in SV hotspots that harbor pre-existing low complexity repeat variation. Comparison of the spectrum of spontaneous SVs to wild isolates implies that natural selection is not only efficient at removing SVs in exons but also effectively removes SVs in intergenic regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.