ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Genetic diagnostics].
Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHereditary tumour disposition syndromes (TDS) are caused by pathogenic germline variants in key genes involved in carcinogenesis and, if left untreated, frequently result in a high lifetime risk for a syndrome-specific spectrum of benign and malignant tumours. Early detection is of high clinical relevance, as effective preventive measures and, in some cases, special therapeutic options are available for patients and other (still healthy) carriers in the family. MATERIALS AND
methodsOur work and expertise as well as the results of a selective literature search are presented.
resultsAn unusually early age of onset, the occurrence of a rare tumour or multiple tumours of a typical spectrum in the patient's medical and/or family history are key clinical indicators. An increasing number of carriers are being identified through the detection of pathogenic variants in tumour tissue, which, depending on gene, age of the affected person and variant allele fraction, constitute an indication for germline testing. Parallel tumour and germline sequencing will accelerate this process in the future. In the age of personalised genomic medicine, close interdisciplinary collaboration between pathology, human genetics and other involved clinical disciplines is essential, including molecular tumour boards.
conclusionTDS represent an exceptionally successful example in the field of preventive oncology and personalised medicine. The increasingly extensive molecular analysis of tumour tissue and the constantly improving detection of many types of genetic alterations using genome-based methods has enabled a new diagnostic pathway for identifying especially those TDS families which do not meet typical clinical criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42340385What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.