ArticleAnatomical science international2026
AI-driven differentiation of 2D proximal femur morphometry and hounsfield units for integrated forensic estimation of sex, stature, and age in a modern Thai dry bone sample.
Article in Anatomical science international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computed Tomography (CT) imaging has expanded possibilities for biological profile estimation in forensic contexts. This study examined whether two-dimensional (2D) morphometric measurements and Hounsfield Unit (HU) values derived from CT scans of dry proximal femora could reliably estimate sex, stature, and age, and whether machine learning (ML) could meaningfully improve on traditional methods. Three hundred left femora from Thai individuals were scanned, and mid-coronal sections were used to extract measurements from defined anatomical regions. For sex estimation, conventional estimation equations reached 93.2% accuracy, while Naïve Bayes classification achieved 96.5% as the best performance among the ML models tested. Stature estimation using sex-specific 2D parameters yielded a Standard Error of Estimate (SEE) of 4.43 cm, which dropped to 3.96 cm when Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) were applied. Age estimation relied on HU values, which showed a consistent negative relationship with age. The lowest SEE for age was 9.67 years from measurements at the Primary Tensile Line (PTL) and Ward's Triangle in females. Models also performed better when applied to older age groups. Although sex-specific equations outperformed mixed-sex ones, the latter were kept in the analysis as a practical alternative when sex cannot be established prior to analysis. Overall, 2D morphometrics proved most useful for sex and stature estimation, while HU values emerged as a reliable, quantitative approach to age estimation. ML consistently improved model performance across all three estimation tasks, supporting its role in modern forensic anthropological practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42340647What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.