ArticleJAMA network open2026
Adolescent Suicidality After State-Level Total Abortion Bans.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Suicide is a leading cause of death among US adolescents, and restrictive abortion policies may influence suicide risk by increasing uncertainty and reducing perceived control over life trajectories, particularly among female adolescents who face disproportionate barriers to abortion access. Following the 2022 US Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization, multiple states implemented total abortion bans. Their association with adolescent suicidality has not been quantitatively assessed. Objective: To evaluate whether implementation of total abortion bans was associated with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among female high school students. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used difference-in-differences and event-study analyses of data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Youth Risk Behavior Surveys (2017, 2019, 2021, and 2023) conducted among female and male students in grades 9 to 12 at public high schools in 15 participating states. Analyses were conducted between January 2025 and February 2026 and stratified by sex. Exposure: State-level implementation of a total abortion ban during the 12 months preceding survey administration. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes of interest were self-reported suicidal ideation (serious consideration or planning) and suicide attempts (≥1) in the past 12 months, measured using Youth Risk Behavior Survey items. Results: The analytic sample included 338 324 students (median [IQR] age, 16 [15-17] years), of whom 169 967 (50%) were female. Among female students, increases in suicidal ideation were greater in states that implemented abortion bans than in states that did not (adjusted difference-in-differences estimate, 4.3 [95% CI, 1.6 to 6.5] percentage points). For suicide attempts, the corresponding estimate was similar but less precise and did not reach statistical significance (adjusted difference-in-differences estimate, 3.2 [95% CI, -0.4 to 6.1] percentage points). Among male students, estimates were smaller and not statistically significant (adjusted difference-in-differences estimate: ideation, 1.1 [95% CI, -0.9 to 4.4] percentage points; attempts, -0.3 [95% CI, -3.2 to 6.6] percentage points). For both sexes, event-study estimates reinforced the difference-in-differences findings and showed no evidence of differential prepolicy trends. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of high school students, implementation of total abortion bans was associated with increased suicidal ideation among female students, with similar but less precise estimates observed for suicide attempts. These findings suggest that the policies in these states may adversely influence female adolescents' mental health and underscore the importance of accessible suicide prevention and mental health services in affected states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.