ArticlePloS one2026
Nesting in anticipation: Spatial ecology of giant honey bees (Apis dorsata) in relation to crop succession mapped by remote sensing.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Seasonal migration and nesting of the giant honeybee Apis dorsata (Fabricius, 1793) are widely associated with mass-flowering crops, yet how colony settlement relates to surrounding landscape structure remains poorly understood. We analysed land-use patterns within the effective foraging range of A. dorsata colonies in the central Chitwan plain, Nepal, using satellite-derived land-use maps from three seasonal snapshots spanning one agricultural cycle: December 1999, February 2000, and April 2000. For each season, land-use composition was quantified radially around nesting sites and compared with spatially constrained random reference landscapes, allowing background seasonal turnover to be separated from nest-specific spatial contrasts. To evaluate both the magnitude and spatial consistency of these contrasts across colonies, we developed a signal-precision framework that integrates contrast strength with repeatability across 55 nesting sites, comprising approximately 300 nests, and 55 matched random locations. Across seasons, the strongest nest-associated signals corresponded to two nectar- and pollen-relevant crops: mustard in December 1999 and buckwheat in February 2000. These signals peaked within 1-3 km of nests, consistent with the effective foraging range of A. dorsata, whereas the distinction between nest-centred and random landscapes became less pronounced at larger distances. Although mustard and buckwheat covered smaller proportions of the landscape than dominant cereals, such as wheat and rice, or other land-use classes, including grassland and fallow land, they consistently emerged as the most spatially precise nest-associated components, highlighting their diagnostic relevance for nesting environments. By separating nest-specific signals from seasonal land-use change and quantifying both their strength and spatial consistency, our colony-centred, null-model-based framework reveals how large-scale agricultural structure becomes reflected in colony settlement patterns. Through interannual return to traditional nesting sites, colony fidelity interacting with structured agricultural dynamics generates distinct nest-centred signals for forage-relevant crops, producing a pattern consistent with apparent anticipation of future resource availability. Although based on data from 1999-2000, this study provides a historical baseline of colony-landscape relationships, with ongoing work aimed at evaluating their persistence under current conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.