Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42341241›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

Vision-Based Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Epilepsy Monitoring: Scoping Review and Taxonomy Development Study.

Mirijana Irnich, Jonas Hammer, Aleksandra Flok, Frank Teuteberg

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mirijana IrnichDepartment of Management Accounting and Information Systems, University Osnabrück, Katharinenstraße 3, Osnabrück, 49074, Germany, 49 5419694926.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1796-7190
Jonas HammerDepartment of Management Accounting and Information Systems, University Osnabrück, Katharinenstraße 3, Osnabrück, 49074, Germany, 49 5419694926.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9262-8331
Aleksandra FlokDepartment of Management Accounting and Information Systems, University Osnabrück, Katharinenstraße 3, Osnabrück, 49074, Germany, 49 5419694926.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-5085-1001
Frank TeutebergDepartment of Management Accounting and Information Systems, University Osnabrück, Katharinenstraße 3, Osnabrück, 49074, Germany, 49 5419694926.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3870-6642

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies for vision-based epilepsy monitoring are advancing rapidly in health care. Despite growing research using various video data sources and analytical approaches, no comprehensive framework exists to classify these technologies. Objective: This scoping review aimed to develop and validate a taxonomy for AI technologies in vision-based epilepsy monitoring and to characterize visual AI approaches in epilepsy care. Methods: Using an extended taxonomy development framework, we developed the taxonomy in 5 iterative cycles, drawing on theory and practice. We conducted a scoping review, market analysis, and applicability evaluation with market-ready solutions. We searched Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed, including MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms; the final search was completed on January 16, 2026. We included primary studies from 2013 onward on AI-based or machine learning-based monitoring or prediction of epileptic seizures in humans using visual data. We excluded reviews, non-English publications, nonepilepsy studies, studies focused only on electroencephalography or wearables, animal studies, and pre-2013 publications. Evidence was charted through narrative and tabular synthesis and descriptive frequency analysis. In line with scoping review guidance, we did not conduct a meta-analysis or critical appraisal. To assess validity and practical relevance, 9 domain experts evaluated the taxonomy using a Delphi technique. Results: We included 40 original studies. Study analysis yielded 16 dimensions, including data acquisition source, tracking target, image processing, classifier type, performance metrics, environment, seizure classification, data privacy, and user interface. Expert feedback added 4 further dimensions, including communication mode and information purpose. The final taxonomy comprises 23 dimensions with 102 characteristics. The review identified structural evidence gaps across settings, evaluation maturity, and reporting practices. Detection and classification in stationary settings predominated, whereas predictive approaches and real-time feedback were limited. Deep learning detection methods were common, but performance reporting was inconsistent, and patient-facing functionalities were limited. Privacy safeguards and standardized metrics were often incompletely reported, reducing comparability and maturity assessment. The taxonomy translates these patterns into guidance for benchmarking, procurement evaluation, user interface, and explainable AI design. We synthesized 5 main findings and 10 implications for research and practice. Key challenges concern standardization, seizure prediction, and real-time applicability. Conclusions: Vision-based AI technologies for epilepsy monitoring are still dominated by proof-of-concept and pilot evaluations, indicating a gap between technical feasibility and deployment-ready systems. This scoping review presents an implementation-oriented taxonomy integrating application context, system architecture, visual analysis, AI models, performance reporting, and feedback design into a single classification framework. Unlike prior work that mainly maps methods or data sources, the taxonomy provides a shared structure for consistent system-level characterization and comparison across studies and emerging solutions. It may support benchmarking, implementation-focused evaluation, procurement, and translation into clinical and home settings.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEpilepsyHumansMonitoring, Physiologicartificial intelligenceclassification systemcomputer visiondigital healtheHealthepilepsyhealth carehealth information systemsmonitoringremote patient monitoring systemstaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID42341241
PMCPMC13293478

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.