ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Reconstruction from multi-planar MRI with foundation models for uterine fibroid analysis.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Uterine fibroids represent one of the most common gynecological diseases and accurate 3D reconstruction is a prerequisite for clinical diagnosis, surgical planning, and treatment evaluation. Routine clinical protocols typically involve a set of orthogonal sagittal, coronal, and transverse MRI scans to assess morphology. These images usually have anisotropic voxels with sparse 3D coverage and existing assessment schemes are often limited to different 2D views based on planar segmentation. Moreover, models trained on data from individual centers often fail to generalize to wider datasets. Accurate and consistent 3D reconstruction for quantitative uterine fibroid analysis, particularly with unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA), is an unmet clinical need. This paper proposes the Foundation Model-Guided Adaptive Segmentation (FGAS) framework for automatic annotation-free multi-planar uterine fibroid MRI segmentation. FGAS uses anatomical priors for pseudo-label optimization, and integrates multi-view consistency constraints and connected component control to reduce planar dependency and suppress false positives. Extensive experiments on clinical datasets demonstrate the superior performance of FGAS, improving the Dice similarity coefficient from 42.8% of baseline models to 70.6%, outperforming existing state-of-the-art UDA and multi-plane methods. These results indicate that FGAS can achieve robust, high-accuracy automated reconstruction for annotation-free multi-view and cross-domain image analysis.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.