Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42343362›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026

A multidimensional evaluation of the Atalante exoskeleton as an assistive locomotion device for individuals with complete paraplegia: a prospective longitudinal study in a controlled environment.

Eric Pantera, Nicolas Reneaud, Claude Bouscavert, Didier Pradon

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06941896 (Study of the Effect of the Atalante Exoskeleton), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06941896 nacompletednot on this map

Study of the Effect of the Atalante Exoskeleton (Wandercraft) on Autonomy in Individuals With Paraplegia Undergoing Rehabilitation (Standing and Walking): A Prospective Uncontrolled Study in a Controlled Environment to Demonstrate Its Physical and Psychosocial Utility.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesRan2017 to 2019Enrolled13ConditionsParaplegia, CompleteArmsUse of the Atalante Exoskeleton
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric PanteraDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Grau du Roi University Rehabilitation Hospital Nimes University Hospital, University Medicine Nimes Montpellier, Rte de Carnon, Le Grau-du-Roi, F-30240, France. eric.pantera@chu-nimes.fr.
Nicolas ReneaudDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Grau du Roi University Rehabilitation Hospital Nimes University Hospital, University Medicine Nimes Montpellier, Rte de Carnon, Le Grau-du-Roi, F-30240, France.
Claude BouscavertCenter of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation APAJH Pionsat, Pionsat, France.
Didier PradonPôle Parasport-Fondation IPS, CHU Raymond Poincare-APHP, Garches, 92380, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobotic exoskeletons are increasingly used in neurorehabilitation, yet evidence remains limited regarding their role as assistive locomotion devices within a compensatory rehabilitation framework, particularly in individuals with complete spinal cord injury. Multidimensional evaluations integrating safety, usability, and patient-reported experience are still scarce.

objectiveTo evaluate the Atalante self-balancing exoskeleton as an assistive locomotion device in individuals with complete paraplegia through a multidimensional analysis conducted in a controlled clinical environment.

methodsThis prospective, monocentric, longitudinal study included adults with chronic complete thoracic spinal cord injury (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade A, neurological level T6-T12). Participants underwent an intensive 6-week program comprising 60 supervised sessions of exoskeleton-assisted training including 40 m walking per session. Outcomes were assessed across three complementary dimensions: (1) safety (medical adverse events, safety-related technical incidents, near-falls); (2) techno-functional usability (donning/doffing performance, assistance levels, cumulative walking exposure); and (3) acceptability (patient-reported comfort and perceived safety using session-based visual analogue scales). Physiological responses were evaluated using exoskeleton-assisted 6-minute walk tests.

resultsThirteen participants were enrolled; eleven completed the full protocol. One serious adverse event occurred, a tibial plateau fracture in a participant with severe osteoporosis (hip T-score - 3.8), leading to study withdrawal. No other serious medical adverse events were observed. Across 651 sessions, four near-fall events were recorded (0.61% of sessions and 0.16% per 10 m walked). Minor adverse events were transient, and no symptomatic orthostatic hypotension was reported. Oxygen consumption, walking speed, and cost of transport (p > 0.05) remained stable between mid- and end-program assessments, while perceived exertion decreased significantly (p = 0.003). Donning time decreased from 790 [475-966] s during the first session to 223 [159-259] s during the final sessions, and doffing time from 242 [152-275] s to 55 [50-69] s, with familiarization plateau points observed after 14 and 18 sessions, respectively. Harness comfort improved over time, whereas perceived safety remained globally stable, except for transient decreases following fall-prone gait events or technical disengagements.

conclusionsUnder supervised clinical conditions, the Atalante exoskeleton demonstrated acceptable safety and feasibility as an assistive locomotion device for individuals with complete paraplegia, enabling hands-free upright indoor walking with low metabolic demand. Severe osteoporosis emerged as a critical risk factor, supporting systematic bone densitometry and cautious exclusion criteria. These findings support the integration of self-balancing exoskeletons into compensatory rehabilitation programs and justify further studies in ecological settings to assess real-world autonomy and participation outcomes. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06941896 (retrospective registration).

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceNeurological RehabilitationParaplegiaSelf-Help DevicesSpinal Cord InjuriesAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesWalkingAssistive locomotionBalance controlExoskeletonParaplegiaRehabilitationSafety

Identifiers

PMID42343362
PMCPMC13551954

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.