Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42343997›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology

Case Report: A rare case of ocular giant cell arteritis with bilateral orbital inflammation and diagnostic challenges.

Alexandru N Lerint, Oreoluwa E Morakinyo, Jae Won Oh, Vijaya Lakshmi Valaparla, Xiangping Li

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexandru N LerintDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas Medical Branch, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, United States.
Oreoluwa E MorakinyoDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas Medical Branch, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, United States.
Jae Won OhDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas Medical Branch, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, United States.
Vijaya Lakshmi ValaparlaDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas Medical Branch, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, United States.
Xiangping LiDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas Medical Branch, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a systemic vasculitis of medium- and large-sized arteries, most commonly presenting with headache, scalp tenderness, and, if untreated, can lead to visual loss from ischemic optic neuropathy. Although the most common ophthalmic manifestations of Giant Cell Arteritis are related to ocular ischemia, orbital involvement can occur and remains underrecognized. Fewer than 10 cases in the literature describe perioptic or retrobulbar infiltration, underscoring the uniqueness and diagnostic challenge of such presentations. Case description: 75-year-old male with past medical history of hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia status post transurethral resection, traumatic subdural hematoma (SDH), who presented with episodic left eye vision loss (central and peripheral vision), followed by acute altitudinal vision loss in the right eye for 1 week. He also complained of right-sided headaches s/p SDH and chronic joint pain, but denied any other constitutional symptoms. The neurological exam revealed significantly decreased right eye visual acuity with an altitudinal field defect, color desaturation, and grade 2 + disc edema. Labs revealed an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of 21 mm/h (normal age-adjusted), and a C-reactive protein (CRP) of 1.9 mg/dL(elevated). Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and orbits, with and without contrast, showed bilateral retrobulbar/perioptic soft-tissue infiltration and enhancement, suggestive of an inflammatory, infectious, or autoimmune process. Blood work showed normal thyroid function and negative rheumatological work-up. Spinal fluid studies were within normal limits except for mildly elevated protein (white-blood cell 3, red-blood cell 1, Protein 52, and Glucose 54, while serum glucose was 94). Temporal artery biopsy was positive for temporal arteritis. His hospital course was complicated by left eye episodic vision loss. High-dose IV steroids led to initial improvement and stabilization of symptoms at discharge, requiring oral steroid taper. 10 months later, he had persistent vision loss in the right eye at the follow-up visit and also suffered complications from chronic steroid use. Conclusion: This case highlights the challenges in diagnosing and treating GCA. Diagnostic delay can occur from under-recognition of atypical presentations. Neuroimaging provided important diagnostic value in this case; however, its routine role in diagnostic criteria requires validation in larger studies.

Indexed as

chronic steroid useocular giant cell arteritisorbital inflammationorbital MRIvision loss in the elderly

Identifiers

PMID42343997
PMCPMC13286754

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.