ArticleCurrent ophthalmology reports2026
Adjuvant Anti-VEGF in Vitrectomy for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: Current Evidence, Timing Considerations, and Clinical Implications.
Article in Current ophthalmology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose of Review: This review evaluates the role of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents as peri-operative adjuvants in pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). We synthesize current evidence on their use before, during, and after PPV, with emphasis on benefits, limitations, risks, and implications for surgical planning. Recent Findings: Randomized trials and meta-analyses consistently show that preoperative anti-VEGF improves surgical safety by reducing intraoperative bleeding, shortening operative time, and lowering rates of early postvitrectomy vitreous hemorrhage, whereas long-term visual acuity benefits remain inconsistent. Intraoperative administration shows weaker and less consistent effects, and postoperative treatment is supported only by small studies, although it may reduce recurrent hemorrhage and anterior segment neovascularization in selected high-risk eyes. Bevacizumab remains the most studied and widely used agent. Newer anti-VEGF agents and higher-dose formulations may offer theoretical advantages, but comparative clinical data specifically in the setting of PDR vitrectomy remain limited. Summary: Preoperative anti-VEGF is currently the most evidence-based perioperative strategy, improving intraoperative conditions and early postoperative outcomes without clearly demonstrated durable functional gains. Critical gaps remain in optimal timing, agent selection, and real-world applicability, particularly in resource-limited settings. Large, pragmatic comparative trials and better risk-stratification tools are needed to refine perioperative anti-VEGF protocols in PDR surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.