Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344333›Full record

ReviewVeterinary world2026

One Health perspective on mycotoxins in poultry production: Ecology, toxicological effects, occupational and environmental exposure, food safety risks, and mitigation strategies (2020-2025).

Nurgul Montayeva, Birzhan Nurgaliyev, Abzal Kereyev, Gaukhar Nagimova, Zhenis Kushmukhanov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary world, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nurgul MontayevaWest Kazakhstan Agrarian and Technical University named after Zhangir Khan, Uralsk 090009, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Birzhan NurgaliyevWest Kazakhstan Agrarian and Technical University named after Zhangir Khan, Uralsk 090009, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Abzal KereyevWest Kazakhstan Agrarian and Technical University named after Zhangir Khan, Uralsk 090009, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Gaukhar NagimovaWest Kazakhstan Agrarian and Technical University named after Zhangir Khan, Uralsk 090009, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Zhenis KushmukhanovWest Kazakhstan Agrarian and Technical University named after Zhangir Khan, Uralsk 090009, Republic of Kazakhstan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycotoxins produced by toxigenic fungi remain a major challenge in poultry production and global food safety. Contamination of poultry feed with aflatoxins, ochratoxin A, fumonisins, deoxynivalenol, T-2 toxin, zearalenone, and other emerging mycotoxins is frequently reported worldwide, particularly under intensive production systems and changing climatic conditions. This review summarizes current evidence published between 2020 and 2025 on the occurrence, ecological drivers, toxicological effects, environmental and occupational exposure, food safety risks, analytical detection methods, and mitigation strategies of mycotoxins in poultry production within a One Health framework. Recent studies indicate that multi-mycotoxin contamination is common in poultry feeds, and emerging and masked mycotoxins may remain undetected by routine analytical approaches, thereby increasing the risk of underestimating exposure. Mycotoxins adversely affect poultry health through hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, oxidative stress, immunosuppression, intestinal barrier disruption, microbiome dysbiosis, impaired reproductive performance, and reduced productivity. In addition, residues of several mycotoxins have been detected in meat and eggs, raising concerns regarding consumer safety. Airborne fungal spores and contaminated dust in poultry houses also represent important occupational hazards for poultry workers. Advances in analytical technologies, particularly Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry, biosensors, molecular diagnostics, and multiplex detection systems, have improved the sensitivity and reliability of mycotoxin monitoring. Various mitigation approaches, including feed hygiene management, adsorbents, probiotics, biological detoxification, and enzymatic degradation, have shown potential to reduce contamination and minimize toxic effects. However, the complete elimination of mycotoxins remains difficult due to the complexity of fungal ecology and the widespread occurrence of co-contamination. Overall, this review highlights the importance of integrated surveillance, improved feed management, advanced detection systems, and coordinated mitigation strategies within a One Health approach to reduce the impact of mycotoxins on poultry health, environmental safety, occupational exposure, and food security.

Indexed as

aflatoxinsclimate changefood safetymasked mycotoxinsmulti-mycotoxin contaminationoccupational exposureOne Healthpoultry production

Identifiers

PMID42344333
PMCPMC13290325

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.