Evidence mapPaperPMID 42344719Full record

ReviewOncology letters2026

Spatiotemporal heterogeneity in non-small cell lung cancer: A paradigm shift from characterization to dynamic management (Review).

Li Cao, Wei Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Li CaoDepartment of Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Guiyang, Guiyang, Guizhou 550081, P.R. China.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University/Guizhou Hospital of The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550001, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has entered the era of precision medicine, characterized by targeted therapies and immunotherapies. However, tumor heterogeneity across spatial and temporal dimensions remains a central cause of therapeutic failure and acquired resistance. Spatial heterogeneity manifests as clonal diversity within a single tumor and between metastatic lesions, while temporal heterogeneity reflects the dynamic evolution of clonal populations under therapeutic pressure. It has proved difficult for traditional static diagnostic and therapeutic models to comprehensively capture this complexity. Advances in technologies such as single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics and liquid biopsy now allow the spatiotemporal evolutionary patterns of NSCLC to be deciphered with unprecedented resolution. Based on these developments, the present review proposed that clinical management strategies need to shift from a static classification paradigm towards a new paradigm of dynamic monitoring and intervention. Emerging strategies are systematically discussed, including evolutionary trap therapy, niche intervention and adaptive therapy, which aim to achieve long-term control of disease progression by steering tumor evolutionary paths, remodeling the tumor microenvironment or leveraging competitive suppression mechanisms. Despite ongoing challenges at the technical, biological and clinical translation levels, a dynamic management framework integrating multi-omics data and intelligent algorithms represents promise for transforming NSCLC into a chronic, controllable disease.

Indexed as

adaptive therapydynamic managementevolutionary dynamicsnon-small cell lung cancertumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID42344719
PMCPMC13288788

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.