ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Meldonium and human sport performance: a narrative review evaluating the evidence for ergogenic potential.
Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meldonium has attracted considerable attention in sports due to its suggested effects on energy metabolism and high-profile doping cases. This narrative review evaluates Meldonium's biochemical mechanisms, pharmacokinetics, safety profile, and the quality of evidence surrounding its use in athletes. While Western literature categorizes Meldonium as a metabolic modulator, Eastern literature often classifies it as an antihypoxic agent. By inhibiting carnitine biosynthesis, Meldonium shifts substrate utilization from fatty acid oxidation toward more oxygen-efficient glucose metabolism. However, despite its widespread use and inclusion on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list, there remains a profound lack of high-quality, randomized placebo-controlled trials demonstrating consistent ergogenic benefits in healthy athletes. Existing human performance studies exhibit a high risk of bias and methodological flaws. This review provides a critical appraisal of the current literature, highlighting the physiological trade-offs of Meldonium use and emphasizing the need for rigorous clinical trials to determine its genuine impact on athletic performance and long-term safety. This comprehensive review aims to clarify Meldonium's pharmacological profile, inform athlete health considerations, and guide future research into its legitimate clinical and sports applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.