Evidence mapPaperPMID 42344756Full record

ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2026

Meldonium and human sport performance: a narrative review evaluating the evidence for ergogenic potential.

Christer Malm, Michael Svensson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christer MalmSection for Sports Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Michael SvenssonSection for Sports Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meldonium has attracted considerable attention in sports due to its suggested effects on energy metabolism and high-profile doping cases. This narrative review evaluates Meldonium's biochemical mechanisms, pharmacokinetics, safety profile, and the quality of evidence surrounding its use in athletes. While Western literature categorizes Meldonium as a metabolic modulator, Eastern literature often classifies it as an antihypoxic agent. By inhibiting carnitine biosynthesis, Meldonium shifts substrate utilization from fatty acid oxidation toward more oxygen-efficient glucose metabolism. However, despite its widespread use and inclusion on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list, there remains a profound lack of high-quality, randomized placebo-controlled trials demonstrating consistent ergogenic benefits in healthy athletes. Existing human performance studies exhibit a high risk of bias and methodological flaws. This review provides a critical appraisal of the current literature, highlighting the physiological trade-offs of Meldonium use and emphasizing the need for rigorous clinical trials to determine its genuine impact on athletic performance and long-term safety. This comprehensive review aims to clarify Meldonium's pharmacological profile, inform athlete health considerations, and guide future research into its legitimate clinical and sports applications.

Indexed as

athleticsdoping in sportsenergy metabolismfatty acid oxidationglucose metabolismmetabolic modulatorsmitochondriasports medicine

Identifiers

PMID42344756
PMCPMC13287051

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.