Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344853›Full record

ReviewMed-X2026

Engineering immune niches: biochemical, mechanical, and spatial design principles for translational hydrogels.

Robert Hincapie, Oriana Marrone Mantovani, José McFaline-Figueroa, Santiago Correa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Med-X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert HincapieDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7358-4543
Oriana Marrone MantovaniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 USA.
José McFaline-FigueroaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4387-1511
Santiago CorreaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8230-4945

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leveraging advanced materials is an increasingly important direction in immune engineering, which aims to reprogram immune responses to treat disease. Once implanted, biomaterials rapidly become sites where immune cells assemble, interact, and collectively shape material performance. These organized multicellular environments, or immune niches, are linked to outcomes ranging from tissue regeneration to durable immune memory, yet the principles governing their formation and function remain poorly understood. In this Mini-Review, we examine how engineered translational hydrogels act both as modulators of immune niches and as tractable in vivo model systems for studying them. We highlight how biochemical cues such as antigens, adjuvants, cytokines, and chemokines control which cells enter a niche and how they become activated, and how biophysical properties including stiffness, viscoelasticity, porosity, and degradability influence cellular access, motility, and phenotype. Adhesion motifs are discussed as a hybrid class of signals that couple biochemical recognition to mechanical force transmission. We also describe how emerging spatial and multi-omic technologies are beginning to reveal the architecture and communication networks that define hydrogel-associated niches. Future progress will require close collaboration between materials scientists, immunologists, and computational biologists to establish the design principles needed to engineer immune niches that improve therapeutic outcomes. Graphical Abstract:

Indexed as

HydrogelsImmune nicheImmune–stromal interactionsImmunoengineeringScaffoldsSpatial transcriptomicsVaccinationWound healing

Identifiers

PMID42344853
PMCPMC13287234

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.