Evidence mapPaperPMID 42344879Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026

Exercise modulates food reward: neurobiological mechanisms and implications for weight management.

Jirui Qiu, Pengfei Ji, Xiaoying Dai, Dan Qiu, Qun Fang, Yansong Li, Tongtong Che, Fanghui Qiu, Shuangshuang Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jirui Qiu *School of Physical Education, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Pengfei Ji *School of Physical Education, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Xiaoying DaiSchool of Physical Education, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Dan QiuBaotou Teachers' College, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou, China.
Qun FangSchool of Physical Education, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Yansong LiSchool of Physical Education, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Tongtong CheSchool of Physical Education, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Fanghui QiuSchool of Physical Education, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Shuangshuang ZhangSchool of Physical Education, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exercise is widely recommended for body weight management and metabolic health, yet its effects are not explained by energy expenditure alone. Post-exercise food choice, hedonic eating, and compensatory energy intake may attenuate expected training benefits. Food reward, encompassing hedonic "liking" and motivational "wanting," is therefore a useful framework for understanding variability in exercise-related weight outcomes. For this narrative review, the literature search was performed using titles, abstracts, keywords, and subject headings as search fields. The search strategy was structured around three core concept modules-exercise, food reward, and potential mechanisms-and Boolean operators were used to combine search terms and develop the retrieval syntax. Relevant published studies were identified through EBSCO, ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection from database inception to April 2026. The overall search process was informed by the SANRA (Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles) principles. The effects of acute and chronic exercise on food reward, together with the neurobiological mechanisms that may contribute to these responses, were examined. Acute exercise may transiently alter the reward value of energy-dense foods, and the direction and magnitude of this effect appear to be influenced by exercise-related factors, including intensity, modality, and time of day, as well as individual factors such as meal-related conditions and body composition. By contrast, chronic exercise may induce adaptive changes in eating behavior and may promote a shift toward healthier dietary patterns. Candidate mechanisms may include changes in mesolimbic dopamine signaling, μ-opioid signaling, insulin-related pathways, glucagon-like peptide-1 signaling, the gut-brain vagal axis, the endocannabinoid system, and stress-sensitive neural circuits. Exercise may also partly counteract diet-induced reward dysfunction and, in some individuals, may be associated with healthier food choice patterns. However, the literature remains heterogeneous because studies differ in population characteristics, exercise protocols, and the reward dimensions assessed. A clearer understanding of these interacting mechanisms may help inform nutrition-informed, exercise-based strategies to support appetite regulation, improve dietary adherence, and enhance long-term weight management.

Indexed as

dopamineexercisefood rewardlikingwantingμ-opioid receptor

Identifiers

PMID42344879
PMCPMC13288417

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.