ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A review of bloodstream infections-pathogens, pathogenesis, diagnostic strategies, treatment methods-challenges and future aspects.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial infarction (MI) initiates a biphasic immune response, which plays a critical role in determining whether the heart undergoes adaptive repair or progresses to pathological fibrosis. Traditional drug and gene therapy delivery systems have been insufficient in precisely modulating this intricate sequence of events in both temporal and spatial dimensions. In recent years, nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (mRNA) technology, encapsulated within lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), has emerged as a novel platform for delivering transient, non-integrating, and repeatable immune modulation to the injured heart. This article will explore recent interdisciplinary advancements in mRNA technology and cardiac immunology from five distinct perspectives. (i) Strategies for mRNA design, encompassing nucleoside modifications and purification techniques, are primarily aimed at circumventing detection by innate immune sensors within inflamed myocardial tissue; (ii) The concept of trained immunity is investigated, focusing on how transient expression of mRNA encoding epigenetic editors may potentially erase pathological epigenetic imprints in myeloid progenitor cells; (iii) Immune cell reprogramming is examined, addressing the myeloid lineage through macrophage polarization and the degradation of neutrophil extracellular traps via metabolic and transcriptional reprogramming, as well as the lymphoid lineage through transient CAR-T cells, in situ-induced regulatory T cells, and regulatory B cells, with an emphasis on the role of cardiomyocytes as paracrine signaling hubs; (iv) The optimization of lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivery technology is discussed, including SORT-based organ-targeting strategies and the immunogenicity challenges faced by lipid carriers in ischemic tissues, alongside the development of next-generation self-amplifying RNA payloads; (v) Standards for clinical translation are outlined, involving representative pipelines such as AZD8601 and mRNA-0184, strategies for repeated dosing from an immunological perspective, and the use of biomarkers to guide precision dosing timing. In conclusion, we propose an innovative framework that integrates spatial transcriptomics, gender-stratified dosing strategies, and multi-mRNA formulation technology, with the objective of establishing a viable pathway for personalized cardiac immune reprogramming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.