ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Vaccines as treatment for melanoma: an update review.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In past three decades, the development of therapeutic vaccines has been a major focus in melanoma research. This strategy seeks to prime the immune system to combat the cancer, ideally leading to the eradication of recurrent disease or a delay in its progression. To date, clinical trials have assessed multiple vaccine methodologies, but the evidence for a clear clinical impact remains ambiguous. Data sources: We retrieved relevant clinical trials published as of 1990 through electronic databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane library and ClinicalTrials.gov. The key search terms were "melanoma," "vaccine," and "clinical trials". Study selection: Publications that met the following criteria were included as follows: (i) melanoma patients included; (ii) clinical trial registered; (iii) described the patients' outcomes; (iv) were full-text articles published in English. Results: A total of sixteen distinct methodologies have been evaluated in randomized phase III clinical trials. Among these, Talimogene laherparevec (T-VEC) is the sole vaccine that has received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for melanoma treatment. Most vaccine strategies demonstrated acceptable safety profiles and elicited immune responses, but they exhibited limited clinical efficacy. When integrated with other immunomodulatory agents, their therapeutic potential appears significantly enhanced. Conclusions: Within future therapeutic frameworks, melanoma vaccines are envisioned to play a key role by inducing and amplifying a targeted T-cell response against cancer. This approach is particularly suited for combination with other immunotherapies that neutralize the resistance mechanisms found in the tumor microenvironment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.