ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Strategic Management of Design and Conceptualization Factors for Wearable Postural Rehabilitation Devices: A Causal Interdependency Analysis.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The implementation of wearable systems in postural rehabilitation offers new perspectives for continuous monitoring, yet their success depends on the interaction between technical parameters and clinical requirements. This study analyzes clinical performance factors to identify strategic levers determining recovery effectiveness. It examines indicators such as postural deviation detection, sensitivity to minor motion changes, suitability for home monitoring, continuous monitoring capability, clinical relevance of extracted parameters, and the capability to assess patient progress over time. Using the DEMATEL methodology, the study highlights influences among these factors in a clinical context. This structural analysis separates primary drivers from rehabilitation outcomes. To refine the analysis, the MICMAC method classifies factors by driving and dependence power, distinguishing determinant, relay, dependent, and autonomous variables. The approach provides an objective basis for managers and designers to prioritize resources toward functionalities with the greatest systemic impact on patient progress. The combined DEMATEL-MICMAC framework enhances decision-making by linking causal relationships with clear hierarchical categorization. The findings may support the integration of wearable technologies into rehabilitation practice by identifying the clinical performance factors with the strongest influence within the system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.