ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Hybrid Decision-Making Management for Material Selection in the Design of Wearable Pressure-Sensing Orthoses in Neurorehabilitation.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wearable pressure-sensing orthoses are increasingly used in neurorehabilitation to support gait recovery, monitor plantar pressure distribution, and improve patient mobility during repetitive therapy sessions. The performance of these devices depends strongly on the materials used in the skin-contact layer, since material properties influence comfort, flexibility, durability, and force transmission during daily use. This study proposes a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the VIKOR method for material selection in sensor-integrated plantar orthoses. Five candidate materials, ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), polyethylene (PE), polyurethane (PU), cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy (CoCrMo), and polypropylene (PP), were evaluated using five criteria: comfort and skin compatibility, elasticity, fatigue resistance, density, and energy dissipation. AHP was applied to determine the relative importance of the evaluation criteria using expert judgment, while VIKOR was used to rank the material alternatives and identify the compromise solution. The results showed that polyurethane achieved the best overall performance due to its balanced behavior in comfort, elasticity, and fatigue resistance, which are essential properties for long-term wearable neurorehabilitation devices. A sensitivity analysis confirmed that moderate variations in expert weighting did not modify the final ranking. Compared with conventional selection approaches based mainly on isolated material properties, the proposed framework offers a clear and reproducible method for integrating mechanical and user-related requirements into the material selection process for wearable orthoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.