Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42345684›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Hybrid Decision-Making Management for Material Selection in the Design of Wearable Pressure-Sensing Orthoses in Neurorehabilitation.

Liliana-Laura Bădiță-Voicu, Roxana-Mariana Nechita, Adrian-Cătălin Voicu, Marius-Ionel Anton, Dana-Corina Deselnicu, Corina-Ionela Dumitrescu, Cristian Radu Badea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liliana-Laura Bădiță-VoicuMechatronics Micro- and Nanotechnologies Department, National Institute of Research and Development in Mechatronics and Measurement Technique, 021631 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9528-5149
Roxana-Mariana NechitaDoctoral School of Entrepreneurship, Engineering, and Business Management, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0009-0004-7556-5572
Adrian-Cătălin VoicuDepartment of Mechatronics and Smart Measurement, National Institute of Research and Development in Mechatronics and Measurement Technique, 021631 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2049-3864
Marius-Ionel AntonDoctoral School of Entrepreneurship, Engineering, and Business Management, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.
Dana-Corina DeselnicuDepartment of Entrepreneurship and Management, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, Business Engineering and Management, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9682-2572
Corina-Ionela DumitrescuDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Entrepreneurship Business Engineering and Management, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3717-7590
Cristian Radu BadeaDepartment of Mechatronics and Smart Measurement, National Institute of Research and Development in Mechatronics and Measurement Technique, 021631 Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable pressure-sensing orthoses are increasingly used in neurorehabilitation to support gait recovery, monitor plantar pressure distribution, and improve patient mobility during repetitive therapy sessions. The performance of these devices depends strongly on the materials used in the skin-contact layer, since material properties influence comfort, flexibility, durability, and force transmission during daily use. This study proposes a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the VIKOR method for material selection in sensor-integrated plantar orthoses. Five candidate materials, ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), polyethylene (PE), polyurethane (PU), cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy (CoCrMo), and polypropylene (PP), were evaluated using five criteria: comfort and skin compatibility, elasticity, fatigue resistance, density, and energy dissipation. AHP was applied to determine the relative importance of the evaluation criteria using expert judgment, while VIKOR was used to rank the material alternatives and identify the compromise solution. The results showed that polyurethane achieved the best overall performance due to its balanced behavior in comfort, elasticity, and fatigue resistance, which are essential properties for long-term wearable neurorehabilitation devices. A sensitivity analysis confirmed that moderate variations in expert weighting did not modify the final ranking. Compared with conventional selection approaches based mainly on isolated material properties, the proposed framework offers a clear and reproducible method for integrating mechanical and user-related requirements into the material selection process for wearable orthoses.

Indexed as

material selectionMCDMpressure-sensingsoft roboticswearable orthoses

Identifiers

PMID42345684
PMCPMC13297046

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.