Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42345756›Full record

ReviewBiology2026

Imaging-Based Spatial Transcriptomics: Data Interpretation Methods and Biomedical Applications.

Wenhao Li, Yuan Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wenhao LiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, State Key Laboratory of Vascular Homeostasis and Remodeling, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Yuan ZhouDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, State Key Laboratory of Vascular Homeostasis and Remodeling, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32570789Peking University Medicine plus X Pilot Program-Artificial Intelligence and Medical Development Initiative BMU2025YXXLHAIYX022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging-based spatial transcriptomics has advanced from low-plex single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization to a diverse set of highly multiplexed platforms, with recent multimodal and pathology-compatible capabilities. Despite major differences in chemistry, coding, and imaging strategies across different platforms, their biological interpretation often converges on a few notable computational biology problems. This review examines imaging-based spatial transcriptomics through the lens of data interpretation and applications, focusing on the analytical framework that converts raw fluorescence signals or accompanying in situ sequencing data into molecule-, cell-, and tissue-level representations. We discuss the key challenges in preprocessing, registration, restoration, feature detection, barcode decoding, molecule calling, cell segmentation, transcript assignment, probabilistic cell typing, spatial-domain inference, and atlas integration. We also highlight how optical crowding, tissue thickness, panel bias, and multimodal complexity increase computational difficulty. Finally, we summarize applications of imaging-based spatial transcriptomics techniques, ranging from subcellular RNA localization to atlas-scale and pathology-aware spatial analysis.

Indexed as

barcode decodingcell segmentationcell typingimaging-based spatial transcriptomicsspatial transcriptome data interpretation

Identifiers

PMID42345756
PMCPMC13296192

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.