Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42345882›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2026

Integration of Machine Learning Techniques in ECG-Based Multiclass Arrhythmia Classification with Explainability Analysis.

Abdullah, Zulaikha Fatima, Abdollah Abadian, Carlos Guzmán Sánchez Mejorada, Miguel Jesús Torres Ruiz, Rolando Quintero Téllez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

AbdullahCenter for Computing Research, Instituto Politecnico Nacional (IPN), Mexico City 07320, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7983-2189
Zulaikha FatimaFaculty of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University, Lahore Campus, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.
Abdollah AbadianCenter for Computing Research, Instituto Politecnico Nacional (IPN), Mexico City 07320, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0004-6581-4053
Carlos Guzmán Sánchez MejoradaCenter for Computing Research, Instituto Politecnico Nacional (IPN), Mexico City 07320, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-6935-2870
Miguel Jesús Torres RuizCenter for Computing Research, Instituto Politecnico Nacional (IPN), Mexico City 07320, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8289-6979
Rolando Quintero TéllezCenter for Computing Research, Instituto Politecnico Nacional (IPN), Mexico City 07320, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-4454-8791

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis is a cornerstone non-invasive diagnostic technique for detecting cardiac arrhythmias, which remain a leading cause of mortality worldwide. While recent advances in deep learning have significantly improved automated arrhythmia classification, the current literature lacks systematic, fair comparisons of fundamental neural architectures under unified experimental conditions, and very few studies provide model interpretability. This study addresses these gaps by first providing a rigorous comparative analysis of three representative architectures-Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and Residual Network (ResNet)-on the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database under identical preprocessing, training, and evaluation protocols. We then propose an efficient Fine-Tuned CNN (FT-CNN) optimized for ECG signal characteristics through adaptive kernel sizing for P-QRS-T morphological extraction, multi-faceted regularization including L2, dropout, and batch normalization, cosine annealing learning rate, and a custom loss function combining weighted categorical cross-entropy with focal loss with gamma equal to 2.0 to address severe class imbalance. The FT-CNN achieves an accuracy of 98.51%, outperforming fourteen benchmark models, including standard CNN with an accuracy of 97.20%, ResNet with 96.88%, LSTM with 96.50%, GRU with 96.30%, and traditional classifiers. Comprehensive ablation studies confirm an improvement of 6.17% over the baseline. Class-wise analysis reveals excellent performance for normal beats with an F1-score of 0.99, ventricular ectopic beats with 0.95, and unknown beats with 0.98, while supraventricular ectopic beats with an F1-score of 0.79 and fusion beats with 0.70 remain challenging. Unlike most prior works, we integrate Grad-CAM and Integrated Gradients for explainability, quantitatively evaluating attribution faithfulness, sanity checks, and noise robustness.

Indexed as

Arrhythmias, CardiacElectrocardiographyMachine LearningAlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSignal Processing, Computer-Assistedcomputer-aided diagnosis systemsconvolutional neural networksdeep learningdeep neural networksECG signalsmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42345882
PMCPMC13296925

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.