ReviewBiosensors2026
Advancements in Nanomaterial-Based Biosensors for Neuropsychiatric and Neurodegenerative Diagnostics: From Biomarker Discovery to Clinical Translation.
Review in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanobiosensors, with their unique physicochemical properties, are transformative tools for diagnosing and monitoring neurodegenerative diseases and mental disorders. This article systematically reviews the latest progress of nanomaterial systems and integrated sensing modalities in neurological disease diagnosis. First, we clarify the multiple functional roles of nanomaterials in biosensors, including signal amplification, interface optimization, and spatial positioning, and compare the applicable scenarios of various sensing principles based on different nanomaterials. Second, we evaluate the design and integration strategies of molecular recognition elements (antibodies, nucleic acid aptamers, molecularly imprinted polymers, and CRISPR-Cas systems) and discuss their synergistic integration mechanisms for improving detection performance. In terms of detection targets, we focus on three applications: high-sensitivity quantification of established protein biomarkers, real-time monitoring of dynamic neurochemicals (dopamine, serotonin, glutamate), and emerging liquid biopsy targets such as exosomal cargo and circulating microRNAs. Finally, to address the core challenges of biofouling, sensitivity-selectivity trade-offs, and multiplex detection in complex matrices, we propose three breakthrough directions for next-generation diagnostics: deep integration of multimodal and multiplexing platforms, closed-loop chemical brain-computer interfaces (cBCIs), and AI-driven predictive diagnostic models, collectively enabling a transition from passive detection to active sensing and intervention for precise, rapid, and non-invasive neurological disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.