ReviewDentistry journal2026
Anatomical Variations in Root Canal Configuration of Maxillary Second Premolars: A Narrative Review.
Review in Dentistry journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The maxillary second premolar, while frequently single rooted, exhibits a high degree of morphological diversity in its internal canal system. This unpredictability can lead to clinical oversights if a simple anatomy is assumed. The aim of this study was to review current knowledge regarding the number of roots and root canal configurations in permanent maxillary second premolars across different populations. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed database for studies published between 2015 and December 2025, with the keyword "maxillary second premolar anatomy." Out of 358 identified articles, 27 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Only human-based studies on maxillary second premolars that used CBCT imaging and were written in English were included. The reviewed studies revealed that single-rooted maxillary second premolars are the most prevalent morphology, occurring in over 70% of cases, although significant variations exist among different ethnic groups. The presence of two roots was the second most common configuration, while three-rooted teeth were rare (<2%). Gender-related differences were also observed, with a higher prevalence of two-rooted teeth in males. Analysis of root canal configurations based on Vertucci's classification demonstrated that all eight types can occur, with Type I being the most frequent in most populations with a result of more than 50% of all teeth. However, substantial variability was noted, with certain studies reporting a higher prevalence of more complex configurations such as Types IV and V. The findings emphasize the importance of thorough knowledge of root canal anatomy and its variations to ensure successful endodontic outcomes. Advanced imaging techniques, particularly cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), play a crucial role in improving diagnostic accuracy and proper endodontic treatment. Further research is needed to better understand anatomical differences across populations and enhance clinical decision-making in endodontics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.