ReviewEuropean burn journal2026
Bridging the Evidence-Practice Gap in Early Burn Injury Care: A Comprehensive Evidence Synthesis of Global Guidelines, Consensus, and Systematic Reviews for Resource-Limited Settings.
Review in European burn journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly management of adult burn injuries in resource-constrained environments-such as battlefields and primary care facilities-remains hindered by the absence of standardized, evidence-based protocols. This study aimed to systematically synthesize existing evidence and develop an integrated framework of actionable recommendations to optimize prehospital and early emergency care.
methodsA comprehensive evidence synthesis was conducted across 14 international and domestic bibliographic databases and authoritative repositories. Eligible sources included clinical practice guidelines, expert consensus statements, evidence summaries, and systematic reviews. Literature quality was appraised using validated instruments, and best-practice recommendations were extracted and thematically synthesized across the continuum of early burn care.
resultsFifty-nine high-quality studies yielded 77 recommendations across 13 domains, spanning from scene safety and burn process cessation through airway, breathing, and circulatory management to wound care, infection control, and transfer preparation. An integrated, context-adaptive framework was established to guide resource-calibrated interventions rather than rigid protocol adherence.
conclusionsThese findings provide tiered guidance for frontline healthcare providers and inform the development of emergency care standards in resource-limited settings. Future research should prioritize field validation and contextual implementation to address barriers to evidence translation and enhance real-world applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.