Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42346075›Full record

ArticleCells2026

Repurposing Antiretroviral Drugs for Urological Cancers: Differential Effects of Protease Inhibitors and NNRTIs on Prostate and Bladder Cancer Cells.

Mariana Pereira, Nuno Vale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mariana PereiraPerMed Research Group, RISE-Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8202-1459
Nuno ValePerMed Research Group, RISE-Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1283-1042

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug repurposing presents as a promising strategy in oncology, particularly for urological prostate and bladder cancers, where resistance to current therapy remains a challenge. This study evaluated the anticancer potential of three antiretroviral drugs, namely ritonavir (RIT), saquinavir (SAQ), and rilpivirine (RPV), in PC-3 and UM-UC-5 cancer cell lines, using MTT, clonogenic, wound healing, toxicity assessment with fibroblast cells, and DCFDA assays; this last method included efavirenz (EFV) and etravirine (ETV) for intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. RIT and SAQ showed stronger antiproliferative effects than RPV, with lower concentration- and cell-line-dependent activity, while clonogenic assays confirmed a reduction in long-term proliferation, particularly for RIT in both cell lines and SAQ for UM-UC-5. In contrast, effects on cell migration were limited for all drugs. ROS production was cell-dependent, with EFV increasing ROS in PC-3 and SAQ and RIT in UM-UC-5 cells. Generally, all drugs showed minimal toxicity in non-malignant cells, with SAQ exhibiting some toxicity but only for concentrations higher than those required for anticancer activity. Overall, these findings suggest that antiretroviral, especially protease inhibitors, may cause anticancer effects, although these are concentration- and context-dependent, and further investigation is needed to understand the mechanisms involved.

Indexed as

Anti-Retroviral AgentsDrug RepositioningProstatic NeoplasmsProtease InhibitorsReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationHumansMaleReactive Oxygen SpeciesAnti-Retroviral AgentsProtease InhibitorsReactive Oxygen SpeciesReverse Transcriptase Inhibitorsantiretroviralscancer therapydrug repurposingurological cancer

Identifiers

PMID42346075
PMCPMC13297251

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.