ReviewCells2026
CAR-M Therapy: From Concept to Clinical Translation in Solid Tumors.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapies have shown significant effectiveness in hematological malignancies, their efficacy in solid tumors remains limited by the hostile tumor microenvironment (TME) and antigen heterogeneity. Recently, CAR-Macrophage (CAR-M) therapy has emerged as a paradigm-shifting approach, leveraging the innate capability of macrophages to deeply infiltrate tumors and their plasticity to reverse immunosuppression. Unlike T cells, CAR-Ms not only mediate direct phagocytosis but also initiate epitope spreading, effectively bridging innate and adaptive immunity. This review critically examines the trajectory of CAR-M therapy from biological rationale to clinical reality. We dissect the engineering evolution of CAR constructs, arguing for macrophage-specific signaling domains (e.g., FcRγ, Megf10) over traditional T-cell designs. Crucially, we address the major bottlenecks in clinical translation, including the manufacturing challenges of non-expanding primary macrophages and the emerging shift toward induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived platforms. Furthermore, we evaluate current clinical trial landscapes and discuss next-generation strategies such as in vivo programming via lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and synthetic logic-gating to enhance safety. Ultimately, overcoming manufacturing constraints and optimizing delivery systems will be pivotal for CAR-M to evolve from a niche therapy into a standard-of-care modality for solid tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.