Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42346140›Full record

ReviewCells2026

CAR-M Therapy: From Concept to Clinical Translation in Solid Tumors.

Chenxi Miao, Zhitao Chen, Juan Chen, Jiazeng Sun, Yanan Sun, Wenbiao Shi, Wentao Xu, Yixuan Li, Xingwang Zhao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chenxi MiaoKey Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Zhitao ChenKey Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Juan ChenKey Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Jiazeng SunKey Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Yanan SunKey Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Wenbiao ShiKey Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7724-9582
Wentao XuKey Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2302-8490
Yixuan LiKey Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Xingwang ZhaoKey Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0009-0008-3618-5488

Funding

China Agricultural University the 2115 Talent Development Program of China Agricultural UniversityNational Key ResearchNational Key Research and Development Program of China 2024YFF1105900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapies have shown significant effectiveness in hematological malignancies, their efficacy in solid tumors remains limited by the hostile tumor microenvironment (TME) and antigen heterogeneity. Recently, CAR-Macrophage (CAR-M) therapy has emerged as a paradigm-shifting approach, leveraging the innate capability of macrophages to deeply infiltrate tumors and their plasticity to reverse immunosuppression. Unlike T cells, CAR-Ms not only mediate direct phagocytosis but also initiate epitope spreading, effectively bridging innate and adaptive immunity. This review critically examines the trajectory of CAR-M therapy from biological rationale to clinical reality. We dissect the engineering evolution of CAR constructs, arguing for macrophage-specific signaling domains (e.g., FcRγ, Megf10) over traditional T-cell designs. Crucially, we address the major bottlenecks in clinical translation, including the manufacturing challenges of non-expanding primary macrophages and the emerging shift toward induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived platforms. Furthermore, we evaluate current clinical trial landscapes and discuss next-generation strategies such as in vivo programming via lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and synthetic logic-gating to enhance safety. Ultimately, overcoming manufacturing constraints and optimizing delivery systems will be pivotal for CAR-M to evolve from a niche therapy into a standard-of-care modality for solid tumors.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveMacrophagesNeoplasmsReceptors, Chimeric AntigenTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsHumansTumor MicroenvironmentReceptors, Chimeric Antigenadoptive cell therapyCAR-macrophageclinical translationepitope spreadingphagocytosissolid tumorstumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID42346140
PMCPMC13297294

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.