ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Mechanisms of Progression and Challenges for Intervention in the Natural History of Early Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review.
Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in men and the incidence is rising globally. Disease-related mortality however remains comparatively low. There is now irrefutable evidence that many men do not need treatment if diagnosed with early cancer and can instead be safely managed conservatively. Active surveillance is therefore now an increasingly popular management option for these men. A minority of men on surveillance however will experience disease progression to a point where radical treatment is necessary. It is therefore logical to consider interventions that might slow down or abrogate this natural history. This is particularly important for subgroups of men with early cancer who are at a higher risk of progression and where the risk-benefit of therapeutic intervention is much more favourable. In this narrative review we explore the literature on known molecular and genetic events in prostate cancer which may drive progression. Our principal focus was to consider mechanisms that could be realistically targeted by therapeutics. We further consider key attributes that early cancer therapeutic trials should incorporate in their design. These include risk-stratified patient selection, bespoke dosing schedules and the importance of unambiguous, clinically meaningful endpoints in this new trial space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.