ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026
Advances in Reperfusion Therapy and Cytoprotection for Acute Ischemic Stroke.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke is one of the leading causes of disability and mortality worldwide, and approximately 87% of cases are acute ischemic stroke (AIS). For patients with AIS, rapid administration of reperfusion therapy within the therapeutic time window remains the most effective treatment strategy. Over the past decade, numerous high-quality clinical trials have driven rapid advances in treatment strategies. Meanwhile, increasing attention has been directed toward cytoprotective therapies aimed at mitigating ischemic and reperfusion-related brain injury, which may act synergistically with reperfusion strategies. Although many related clinical trials have failed to demonstrate clear clinical benefit, they have provided valuable insights for the development of future cytoprotective agents. This review focuses on recent advances and remaining challenges in reperfusion therapy and cytoprotection for AIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.