ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2026
Bridging Ancestry-Stratified Bias in Pharmacogenomics AI: Toward Metabolomics-Inclusive Multi-Omics Precision Medicine.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmacogenomics AI offers significant potential for individualized drug therapy; however, its clinical benefits remain unevenly distributed. Models trained predominantly on European-ancestry data consistently underperform in non-European populations, with polygenic risk scores (PRS) showing an estimated 39-73% reduction in predictive accuracy in African-ancestry cohorts across complex traits. These disparities have driven increased interest in moving beyond single-layer genomic approaches. Multi-omics frameworks integrating genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data have emerged as a promising strategy to improve prediction across heterogeneous clinical populations, as each molecular layer provides distinct and complementary biological information. Among these layers, metabolomics may represent a particularly transferable component across populations. Metabolite profiles capture the downstream functional output of biological systems influenced by genetic, environmental, dietary, and microbiome-related factors, and may therefore be less reliant on ancestry-stratified allele frequency structures that underlie performance disparities in genomic models. This review synthesizes evidence regarding the mechanistic basis of genomic bias in pharmacogenomics AI, the emerging role of multi-omics integration, especially metabolomics, in improving predictive performance, and the current landscape of computational strategies for bias mitigation, including federated learning, transfer learning, domain adaptation, and synthetic data generation. Collectively, current evidence supports metabolomics-inclusive multi-omics frameworks as a biologically plausible, hypothesis-generating strategy to reduce reliance on ancestry-linked genomic features. However, direct evidence that such frameworks reduce ancestry-related bias in clinical AI outputs remains limited, underscoring the need for globally diverse datasets and prospective multi-population validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.