ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2026
Three-Dimensional Bronchovascular Modelling in Sublobar Pulmonary Resection: A Tool for Personalised Thoracic Surgery.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sublobar pulmonary resection has become an increasingly adopted approach for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer, driven by evidence that anatomical segmentectomy can achieve oncological outcomes comparable to lobectomy in selected patients. Safe execution of sublobar resection depends on accurate preoperative identification of segmental bronchovascular anatomy, which demonstrates substantial variability. Conventional two-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT) imposes significant limitations on anatomical interpretation, particularly at the segmental and subsegmental level. Three-dimensional (3D) bronchovascular modelling provides patient-specific representations of segmental anatomy and relationships that address these limitations. This narrative review examines the current and emerging roles of 3D modelling in personalised thoracic surgery. It discusses the anatomical basis for its application, the limitations of conventional imaging, and the contribution of 3D modelling to preoperative planning and intraoperative decision making. It also considers broader applications, current limitations, and future directions, with emphasis on how patient-specific 3D modelling can support more tailored operative strategies and more individualised surgical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.