ReviewMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Calcineurin Inhibitors in Atopic Dermatitis: Balancing Tradition with Emerging Therapeutics.
Review in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic inflammatory condition of the skin that has increased dramatically over the past decade and significantly impacts individual quality of life. Corticosteroids are still the primary therapy for AD, but there are limitations to their continued use due to potential adverse effects, particularly when used in sensitive areas. Topical calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), such as tacrolimus and pimecrolimus, are available as a safe, steroid-sparing alternative that directly inhibit calcineurin-mediated activation of T cells and have been shown to be efficacious according to varying clinical study designs including randomized controlled trials, registry studies and meta-analyses. Although there was controversy regarding the safety of CNIs subsequent to the FDA's black-box warning in 2006, the preponderance of evidence supports their continued safety when used as directed. In contrast to biologics and JAK inhibitors, CNIs occupy an inherently unique therapeutic niche for use in pediatric patients, have demonstrated historical efficacy, and can provide localized affordable treatment in sensitive areas including the face, eyelids and intertriginous surfaces. Furthermore, the role of CNIs in the context of precision dermatology continues to be defined through new innovations including barrier-repair strategies used in combination with topical medications, microneedle systems, and nanocarrier formulations. Hence, the role of CNIs in the current AD treatment paradigm is crucial and lies at the interface between topical corticosteroids and systemic immunomodulatory agents. The narrative review discusses recent advances in formulation strategies, combination approaches, and targeted delivery systems, underscoring how CNIs continue to bridge established practice and emerging therapeutic innovation in AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.