ReviewNeuroSci2026
The Hoffmann Reflex.
Review in NeuroSci, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human spinal cord is increasingly recognized as an active and adaptable component of sensorimotor function, contributing to motor control, pain modulation, and recovery after neurological injury. Within this framework, the Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex) has evolved from a classical electrophysiological phenomenon into a useful probe of spinal circuit function. Rather than reflecting motoneuron excitability alone, H-reflex amplitude and modulation arise from the interaction of Ia afferent transmission, presynaptic inhibition, homosynaptic depression, and interneuronal networks that regulate sensorimotor gain in a state-dependent manner. This review synthesizes classical and contemporary evidence to position the H-reflex as an indirect measure of spinal inhibitory function in humans. We integrate physiological mechanisms with findings from studies in chronic pain syndromes, spasticity, Parkinson's disease, and recovery after central nervous system injury, where alterations in spinal inhibitory processes have been described. We further discuss methodological and conceptual challenges that limit clinical translation, including state dependence, protocol heterogeneity, and the lack of normative reference frameworks. Finally, we outline directions for integrating H-reflex paradigms with complementary approaches to improve the interpretation of spinal circuit function and its relation to clinical phenomena. Framed in this context, the H-reflex can be considered a valuable experimental and translational tool, whose utility depends on careful methodological implementation and physiologically informed interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.