ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Current Status of
Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Herpesvirus infections belong to major pathogens in the human population. This study aimed at evaluating diagnostic data for eight human herpesviruses, based on datasets derived from a large European tertiary care center. Specifically, we analyzed 118,692 herpesvirus submittals to the Diagnostic Division of the Virological Institute, University Hospital Erlangen (UKER), Germany, between July 2014 and June 2024. Our points of focus were the following: (i) the frequencies of herpesvirus diagnostic results with positivity rates, (ii) departments representing main sample submitters, (iii) the specific importance of intensive care units (ICUs), (iv) the COVID-19 pandemic period, and (v) distinct properties of sample types. Overall, we are stating the highest frequencies of diagnostic assessment for herpes simplex virus (HSV), human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infections, pointing to their dominant relevance for clinical practice. Notably, HCMV submittals (46.6% of total), together with EBV (26.2%) and HSV (15.7), accounted for almost 90% of all herpesviral diagnostic samples during this period. Within these key groups, HCMV, EBV and HSV showed positivity rates of 14.5%, 35.0%, and 18.5%, respectively. Concerning a main input of sample submittals, two departments were predominant in our center, i.e., the Departments of Haematology-Oncology and Anaesthesiology. These included patients under multifold types of treatment associated with an increased risk of herpesvirus reactivation or primary infection. Furthermore, another high portion of submittals was noted for ICUs and external sources. In addition, a numerical, transient increase in herpesvirus diagnostic submittals, from various sources, was shown for the COVID-19 pandemic years (mostly 2021) as compared to other periods. Combined, these data underlined the importance of clinical monitoring of herpesvirus infections, particularly for high-risk patients, and the steady need of improvements in preventive measures, therapeutic options, and safe diagnostic tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.