Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42347618›Full record

ReviewVaccines2026

Cancer Vaccines in Genitourinary Malignancies: Current Advances and Future Directions.

Haider Altay, Ibrahim Al-Hashimi, Josh Matthews, Grace DeAlessandro, Ghanshyam H Ghelani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Haider AltayHematology and Medical Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX 75708, USA.
Ibrahim Al-HashimiHematology and Medical Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX 75708, USA.
Josh MatthewsHematology and Medical Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX 75708, USA.
Grace DeAlessandroHematology and Medical Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX 75708, USA.
Ghanshyam H GhelaniHematology and Medical Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX 75708, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1363-8738

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic cancer vaccines are a promising immunotherapy approach in genitourinary (GU) cancers, designed to stimulate antitumor immune responses through antigen-specific T-cell activation. Although agents such as bacillus Calmette-Guérin in bladder cancer and sipuleucel-T in prostate cancer have shown success, vaccine monotherapy has generally produced limited clinical benefit due to tumor heterogeneity, poor immune infiltration, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments. Multiple vaccine platforms have demonstrated safety and immunogenicity in prostate, renal cell, and urothelial cancers, but efficacy remains modest. Current strategies focus on multi-antigen targeting, improved antigen presentation, and combination therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors, radiotherapy, and targeted agents to enhance antitumor activity. Advances in personalized vaccine design and delivery systems are driving progress, though challenges such as manufacturing complexity, cost, and biomarker development remain. Ongoing translational and clinical research will be critical to improving the effectiveness of vaccine-based immunotherapy in GU malignancies.

Indexed as

cancer vaccinesgenitourinary cancersimmunotherapyneoantigensprostate cancerrenal cell carcinomatumor microenvironmenturothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID42347618
PMCPMC13308453

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.