ReviewVaccines2026
Tools for Antigen Delivery: From Traditional Nanocarriers and Biomimetic Platforms to Emerging Physical, Bioengineered and Computational Approaches.
Review in Vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nanoparticle Engineering in Modern Vaccinology: From Delivery Platforms to Immune-Programming Architectures.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The magnitude and quality of adaptive immune responses are fundamentally influenced by the efficiency of antigen presentation. Traditional vaccine platforms, such as live-attenuated or inactivated pathogens, although immunogenic, often present safety concerns. Conversely, subunit vaccines, despite being safer, generally exhibit poor immunogenicity due to inadequate delivery of antigens to professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs). To address this issue, the development of innovative delivery systems has become a pivotal strategy to overcome significant biological barriers, including extracellular antigen degradation, suboptimal lymph node targeting, and inefficient cross-presentation necessary for CD8+ T cell activation. This review systematically explores recent advancements in delivery technologies aimed at enhancing antigen presentation, encompassing rationally engineered nanocarriers and sophisticated biomimetic platforms. We first examine how nanoparticle properties like size, surface charge, and ligand density affect intracellular trafficking and the transition from MHC-II to MHC-I cross-presentation. Then, we explore bioinspired systems such as extracellular vesicles, virus-like particles, and cell-membrane-coated nanoparticles that utilize natural biological traits for enhanced targeting and immune modulation. Additionally, we review new physical delivery methods like microneedle arrays and in situ electroporation for direct, minimally invasive antigen delivery to dendritic cells. Lastly, we discuss the potential of these platforms in personalized cancer vaccines and combination immunotherapies. By combining insights from materials science, immunology, and bioengineering, these next-generation delivery tools could enhance antigen presentation and transform precision vaccination and immune intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.