SynthesisJournal of evidence-based medicine2026
Clinical Effects of Acupuncture in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: An Umbrella Review of Level I Evidence.
Synthesis in Journal of evidence-based medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis across different comparators, including usual care, sham acupuncture, waiting-list, pharmacological treatments, and other non-pharmacological interventions.
methodsAn umbrella review of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in adults with knee osteoarthritis was performed. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases were searched. Comparisons were conducted among different acupuncture types. Methodological quality was assessed using Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR), and the best available evidence was selected.
resultsTwenty-three systematic reviews were included, with a mean R-AMSTAR score of 30.87. Most acupuncture modalities showed consistent improvements in pain and physical function. Compared with sham acupuncture, usual care, and waiting-list, acupuncture produced clinically meaningful improvements in pain and joint function. Compared with pharmacological treatments, acupuncture demonstrated effects similar to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, while electroacupuncture was superior in improving joint stiffness and overall response rates. Compared with Tui Na or massage, acupuncture showed a slower onset of effect and similar or slightly inferior improvements in function and stiffness. Adverse events were generally mild and local, with a lower risk of gastrointestinal complications. Treatment effects were most evident at the end of treatment and during short-term follow-up (<3 months), whereas long-term evidence remained limited.
conclusionsAcupuncture of all modalities relieves pain and improve function in knee osteoarthritis patients, thus is a key non-pharmacological option or add-on therapy when medications are unsuitable. For optimal and sustained effect of acupuncture treatment in knee osteoarthritis, more rigorous sham acupuncture-controlled designs and long-term follow-up are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.