Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42347764›Full record

ReviewPsychophysiology2026

Preprocessing on the Go: Practices in Gait-Related Mobile EEG.

Vaishali Vinod, Lara Johanna Papin, Robbin Romijnders, Walter Maetzler, Julius Welzel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vaishali VinodDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel and Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2951-2208
Lara Johanna PapinNeuropsychology Lab, Department of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-2967-9418
Robbin RomijndersDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel and Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Walter MaetzlerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel and Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Julius WelzelDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel and Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8958-0934

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 464552782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobile EEG has become popular in investigating brain dynamics during gait in recent years. Within this development, new preprocessing pipelines have been introduced and refined. The diversity of approaches, however, complicates comparisons across studies. To provide clarity, we reviewed studies that combined mobile EEG with gait measurements to map the preprocessing pipelines used in the field. Our review identified substantial heterogeneity in pipeline steps, their order, combinations, and the level of reporting detail. We visualized this heterogeneity as a map, tracing pathways from raw data to outcomes such as Power spectral density (PSD), Event-related spectral perturbations (ERSP), Event-related (de-) synchronization (ERD/ERS), and Corticomuscular coherence (CMC), along with a subsequent analysis highlighting unique pipelines. Notably, artifact rejection varied across studies in both the tools used and reporting practices. While differences in hardware, setup, and experimental paradigms can justify this variability, they also challenge comparability across findings. These results emphasize the need for transparent reporting standards and provide a foundation for future efforts toward developing shared standards in the mobile EEG community.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyGaitSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedHumansartifact rejectiongaitmobile EEGpreprocessingwalking

Identifiers

PMID42347764
PMCPMC13296838

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.